My recent post about PLS-00231 prompted an entirely reasonable question from Andrew :
“OK so the obvious question why [can’t you reference a private function in SQL] and doesn’t that defeat the objective of having it as a private function, and if so what about other ways of achieving the same goal ?”
I’ll be honest – that particular post was really just a note to self. I tend to write package members as public initially so that I can test them by calling them directly.
Once I’ve finished coding the package, I’ll then go through and make all of the helper package members private. My note was simply to remind myself that the PLS-00231 error when compiling a package usually means that I’ve referenced a function in a SQL statement and then made it private.
So, we know that a PL/SQL function can only be called in a SQL statement if it’s a schema level object or it’s definied in the package header because that’s the definition of a Public function in PL/SQL. Or at least it was…
In formulating an answer to Andrew’s question, it became apparent that the nature of Private functions have evolved a bit in 12c.
So, what I’m going to look at here is :
- What are Private and Public package members in PL/SQL and why you might want to keep a package member private
- How 12c language features change our definition of private and public in terms of PL/SQL objects
- Hopefully provide some up-to-date answers for Andrew
I’m in a slight trough of a week at the moment.
The excitement of seeing what Santa brought has begun to fade but I’ve yet to summon the requisite enthusiasm for seeing in the New Year.
So this post is really one of those little “Notes to self” so that I can save myself some time when next I need to spin up an Oracle database on a VirtualBox VM…
There are times when I feel like Baldrick.
One moment I’m all boundless optimism and cunning plans and the next, I’m so confused I don’t know what my name is or where I live.
One such recent bout of existential uncertainty was caused by the error mentioned in the title of this post, or to give it it’s full name :
PLS-00231 : Function <function name> may not be used in SQL
So, from the beginning…
According to the hype doing the rounds at the moment, we’re all about to be replaced by Robots and/or Artificial Intelligence.
Alexa, Cortana, Siri, we already have computers that are talking to us.
Incidentally, all of these devices seem to have female voices, even the gender-neutrally named Google Assistant.
Deb reckons that this is because everyone understands that, when it comes down to it, women know best.
Whilst I wouldn’t presume to question this assertion, I must confess to being somewhat unconvinced as to the inevitability that AI is about to take over the world.
For a start, there are those automated checkouts that have been in supermarkets for several years now.
Not only are they all rather temperamental, they all have their own individual quirks.
Then there are the Sat-Navs they’re incorporating into cars. What with one thing and another I seem to be spending an increasing amount of my life arguing with other programmers’ bugs…
It was late. In a corner of the Treasury however, a light burned brightly.
Phillip Hammond, Chancellor of the Exchequer, was still working.
“Spreadsheet Phil” was trying to formulate a plan to rectify the nation’s finances in the event that the Prime Minister was won over by the ebullient Mr Johnson and decided upon a “No Deal” Brexit.
Boris Johnson was currently based at the F.O. which, Phil considered darkly, was somewhat appropriate.
If only his predecessor had had the foresight to stick a couple of billion on Liecester City to win the league at 5000 to 1, The Country’s finances would be in much better shape.
In the midst of this gloomy reflection, he was struck by a sudden inspiration. The crowded half-hour that followed resulted in – what else – a spreadsheet.
The information therein could save The Economy. “Hmmm”, thought Phil, “this stuff is far too important to leave in Excel, I really need to put it into my Oracle database. I wonder if SQLDeveloper could help”… Continue reading
Events have taken a worrying turn recently. I’m not talking about Kim Jong Un’s expensive new hobby, although, if his parents had bought him that kite when he was seven…
I’m not talking about the UK’s chief Brexit negotiator David Davies quoting directly from the Agile Manifesto and claiming that the British were “putting people before process” in the negotiations, although Agile as a negotiating strategy is rather…untested.
I’m not even talking about the sunny Bank Holiday Monday we had in England recently even though this may be a sign of Global Warming ( or possibly a portent for the end of days).
The fact is, we have an Ashes series coming up this winter and England still haven’t managed to find a top order that doesn’t collapse like a cheap deckchair in a light breeze.
On top of that, what started out as a relatively simple post – effectively a note to myself about using the row_number analytical function to overcome a recent performance glitch in a Data Warehouse Application – also seems to have developed an unexpected complication…
When I started programming, the world was black and white. I’d write my code in Vi on Unix ( Sequent’s dynix/ptx if you want to get personal) and then run it through a compiler to find any errors. End of story, [Esc]:wq!.
Then, along came GUI IDEs with their white backgrounds and syntax colouring.
Things now seem to have come full circle as the colour schemes currently en vogue for IDEs tend to look a bit like this :
Finding a lightweight, general purpose IDE for Linux has been something of a quest for me. It’s not that there aren’t any out there, it’s just that none of them quite seemed to be exactly what I was looking for. Until now.
Look, I know that programmers tend to be rather attached to their favourite editor/IDE and this post is not an attempt to prise anyone away from their current toolset. It is simply an account of how I managed to install and configure Visual Studio Code in Ubuntu to use for Python.
Hang on, lightweight ? We’re talking about Microsoft Visual Studio, right ?
Actually, Visual Studio Code (VS Code) is a rather different beast from the Visual Studio Professional behemoth that’s used for knocking up .Net applications on Windows.
What I’m going to cover here is :
- Installing VS Code
- Adding the Python plug-in
- Adding a Python linter
- Executing a program the simple way
- Using intellisense for code-completion
- Debugging a program
- Executing a program inside VS Code
If you’ve stumbled across this post in the hope of finding some information about setting up VS Code for PL/SQL, I would refer you to Morten Braten’s excellent post on the subject.
Here and now though, it’s Python all the way… Continue reading