It was late. We were snuggled up on the sofa, watching a Romcom and debating whether to go to bed or see it through to the bitter( well, sickly sweet) end.
Wearily, I made the point that in the end the film would follow Heigl’s Iron Law of Romcom which can be summarised as “Katherine always gets her man”.
Deb begged to differ. Her argument was that, for every Colin Firth, riding into the sunset with his Bridget Jones, there’s a poor( largely blameless) Patrick Dempsey whose immediate future includes long-evenings alone in front of the telly and shopping for microwave meals for one.
The point is that even the most rigid rules tend to have their exceptions.
The star of this post is the oft-quoted rule that PL/SQL program units should always be incorporated into a Package.
There are special cameo appearances by “Never use Public Synonyms” and the ever popular “Never grant privileges to Public”.
If there’s one thing that 2016 has taught us is that rules (and in some cases, rulers) are made for breaking. Oh, and that it’s worth putting a fiver on when you see odds of 5000-1 on Leicester winning the League.
Having lacked the foresight to benefit from that last lesson, I’ve spent several months looking at Unit Testing frameworks for PL/SQL. In the course of this odyssey I’ve covered:
We’re living in a Post-truth age. I know this because I read it in my Fake News Feed.
Taking advantage of this, I’ve updated the definition of PL/SQL.
Up until now, it would be true to say that PL/SQL is a 3GL based on ADA that’s incorporated into the Oracle RDBMS.
Post truth, the definition is that PL/SQL is a 3GL that comes with it’s own built-in Oracle RDBMS.
By a stroke of good fortune, my son recently bought me a copy of Ghost in the Wires by Kevin Mitnick and William L Simon, which begins each chapter with an encrypted phrase.
If your anything like me, you’d spend a fair amount of time geeking over this sort of problem, most likely using some fashionable programming language to help solve the riddles with which you were presented.
There is method in the madness. It’s now clear that Donald Trump’s reluctance to commit to the Paris Climate Change Accord is because US methane emissions have been hugely under estimated. Yes, it turns out that there are many more Shy Trumpers in America than (almost) anyone expected.
Meanwhile, back in the UK we know that Brexit means Brexit but we still don’t know what Brexit means.
In amongst the chaos, UKIP have decided to take a fresh approach to the business of selecting a leader. This time, they’re staging a Cage Match.
Taking a leaf out of UKIP’s book I’ve decided to take a slightly unusual approach to Unit Testing my PL/SQL code.
Having looked at the SQLDeveloper Unit Testing Tool and utPLSQL, both of which utilise the database to persist objects, this time, I’m taking a look at a framework which takes a rather less database-centric approach, namely ruby-plsql-spec.
What I’ll be looking at is :
Installation of the framework and required components
You’ll be relieved to hear that I’m not going to talk about Brexit any more. It’s done and finished and it’s time everyone moved on.
Besides, from my current vantage point ( a small island off the coast of Europe), other people have their own problems.
In the USA for example, the nation is currently engrossed in what appears to be an exercise to find the second most unpopular person in the country…and make them President.
If the subject of this post were a Presidential Candidate, it would probably be nicknamed “The Comeback Kid”.
No, Bill Clinton hasn’t released a PL/SQL testing framework, but Steven Feuerstein has and – contrary to what you may have heard – utPLSQL is very much alive and kicking.
As the first Test framework written specifically for PL/SQL, utPLSQL is the perfect subject for my continuing testing odyssey.
The Political fallout from Brexit continues unabated.
In the immediate aftermath of the vote, David Cameron resigned as Prime Minister, triggering a power-struggle to succeed him.
Secret pacts, double-crosses and political “assassination” followed in short order.
It was like watching an episode of Game of Thrones although, mercifully, without the full-frontal nudity.
As for the Labour Party, they have captured the Zeitgeist…by descending into the sort of internal conflict for which the word “internecine” was invented.
Following the current trend that promises are made for breaking, this post has arrived a little bit later than advertised.
I write most of this stuff on the train to and from work, and, as they have been unusually punctual of late, my Sprint 1 velocity is somewhat lower than anticipated.
So, with apologies for my tardiness… Continue reading →
In the aftermath of the Brexit vote, I’m probably not alone in being a little confused.
Political discourse in the UK has focused on exactly who it was who voted to Leave.
The Youth Spokesperson you get on a lot of political programs right now, will talk accusingly of older voters “ruining” their future by opting to Leave.
Other shocked Remainers will put it down to people without a University Degree.
I’m not sure where that leaves me as someone who is ever so slightly over the age of 30, does not have a degree…and voted to Remain. I’m pretty sure I’m not Scottish…unless there’s some dark family secret my parents haven’t let me in on.
I suppose I must be a member of the “Metropolitan Elite” the Leave side was always muttering darkly about.
After all, I do pay a great deal of money to be driven from my country residence to London to work every day…although I do have to share the train with the odd one or two fellow elitists who’ve made the same extravagant choice.
This does of course assume that Milton Keynes qualifies as being “in the country” and that my living there is a matter of choice rather than a question of being able to afford living any closer to London.
With all the excrement…er…excitement of the Referendum Campaign and it’s aftermath, I somehow never got around to writing my application to track the progress of the Euros (or the Copa America for that matter).
Whenever a major football tournament comes around, I always resolve to do this, if only to evoke memories of my youth when a large part of my bedroom wall was taken up with a World Cup Wallchart where you could fill in the results as they happened. That’s without mentioning the months leading up to the tournament and trying to complete the Panini collection – the only time you’d ever hear a conversation such as “OK, I’ll let you have Zico in exchange for Mick Mills”.
In order to prevent this happening again, I’ve resolved to write an application capable of holding details of any major international football tournament.
In the course of writing this application, I’d like to take the opportunity to have a look at an aspect of PL/SQL development that maybe isn’t as commonly used as it should be – Unit Testing.
Over the next few weeks, I plan to take a look at some of the Testing Frameworks available for PL/SQL and see how they compare.
The objective here is not so much to find which framework is the best/most suitable, but to perform an objective comparison between them using the same set of tests which implement fairly commonly encountered functionality.
In this post, I’ll be outlining the functionality that I’ll be testing in the form of User Stories, together with the application data model (or at least, the bit of it I need to execute the tests).
I’ll also have a look at the common pattern that tests written in these frameworks tend to follow.
Just to highlight why using a Test Framework might be useful, I’ll also script a couple of simple tests in SQL to see just how much code you have to write to implement tests without using a framework. Continue reading →